IOCE Atlas · Reference

Definitions, Methodology
& Datasets

The isocratic principle used to explain phenomena — foundational concepts, measurement framework, and data sources underpinning the IOCE Atlas analytical layer.

Core Documents
Theoretical Foundation
Isocracy: The Model
The constitutional principle that governance becomes legitimate only when power — both formal authority and actual operative control — is distributed so widely, transparently, and corrigibly that no actor can maintain durable domination.
Measurement Framework
The Rudiments of OCDI
A plain-language explanation of the Ownership-Control Divergence Index — the formula that measures how far a system is from a fair balance between ownership and control, with worked examples and philosophical grounding.
Open Commons · v0.1 (provisional)
Machine-readable ontology
The concepts on these pages as JSON, JSON-LD and Turtle — each term marked documented, inferred, proposed or unknown, with its source. Guide for people and AI systems at /ai/.
Isocratic Principles Applied in the Atlas
1
Equal civic standing — no actor accumulates durable domination
2
Ownership-control alignment — OCDI measures the divergence
3
Transparency — auditable data flows as constitutional requirement
4
Structural balance — five-branch counterweight architecture
5
Corrigibility — drift must be detectable and correctable
6
Anti-capture — institutional legitimacy requires real power distribution
How OCDI Is Scored in This Atlas
i
The OCDI of an entity measures the gap between ownership (economic stake) and control (effective decision power). For the curated global layer, ownership/control are not yet audited per entity, so OCDI is assigned by a documented structural heuristic: each entity's publicly-known ownership/control class maps to an OCDI proxy. State-controlled and founder/dual-class structures diverge most; widely-held institutional ownership diverges least.
ii
For private/oligarch entities the OCDI is computed directly as the ownership-control wedge — the absolute difference between an individual's estimated economic ownership and voting/effective control of their primary holdings.
iii
For governments the OCDI expresses divergence between nominal public ownership (citizens) and concentration of effective control, assigned by a governance class (consolidated-democracy → authoritarian).
Data Layers & Provenance Tiers

Every point carries a provenance tier and a confidence level — shown in the marker (audited renders solid; less-certain data renders fainter and dashed) and in its popup. A live Baltic-register ingestion pipeline (GLEIF, OpenOwnership, the Estonian and Latvian registers) feeds the staging layer; the global layer below is curated.

Data layer Tier Coverage Confidence
Largest companies by revenue
curated · public compilation
One-time snapshot 48 global corporations Heuristic
Energy producers by source
curated · public compilation
One-time snapshot 30 firms — oil/gas · nuclear/uranium · solar · wind Heuristic
Government budgets
curated · general govt expenditure
One-time snapshot 30 national governments (incl. per-capita) Heuristic
Private / oligarch ownership
curated CSV · estimated holdings
Curated CSV 22 controlling individuals Heuristic
Non-profits & advocacy
curated · public compilation
One-time snapshot 24 foundations & NGOs Heuristic
Baltic registers · GLEIF · OpenOwnership
api.gleif.org · openownership.org · ur.gov.lv · ariregister.rik.ee
Live ingestion (staging) EE · LV registered entities & beneficial ownership Live feed
Seeded Baltic institutions
ioce-atlas internal
Curated seed ~290 Baltic-concentrated entities Estimate
How to Read Confidence
●
Audited — sourced, verified ownership/control. Marker solid. (None yet in the global layer.)
◌
Structural heuristic — OCDI inferred from ownership/control class. Marker dashed.
◌
Estimate — a numeric seed confidence. Marker dashed, labelled with a percentage.
·
Unspecified — no recorded provenance. Marker dotted and faint.